The White House outlined a proposed TikTok restructuring that would give Americans six of seven board seats and place the recommendation algorithm under US control. Major investors including Oracle, Andreessen Horowitz and Silver Lake are expected to take roles while ByteDance retains a minority stake.
The White House on Sept. 20, 2025 provided new details about a proposed restructuring of TikTok’s US operations that aims to put governance and technical control in American hands. Under the plan, Americans would hold six of seven board seats and the app’s recommendation algorithm would be US controlled. Could this become a model for balancing TikTok national security concerns with consumer access?
For years US officials have argued that TikTok’s relationship with its Chinese parent, ByteDance, poses national security and data privacy risks. Regulators worry that the combination of algorithmic influence and access to user data could enable targeted influence operations or expose sensitive personal information. Past options included congressional pressure, deadlines, and proposals ranging from forced sale to outright bans. The current proposed deal is an attempt to address those risks through structural separation rather than removing the service for US users.
The White House disclosed several concrete elements of the proposed deal, as reported by mainstream outlets on Sept. 20, 2025. These details touch on governance, algorithm control, investor roles, and enforcement measures linked to US TikTok legislation 2025 discussions.
The recommendation algorithm refers to the AI models and automated systems that analyze user behavior and content to decide what appears in feeds. US control means the US entity would host, update, and set the rules for those models inside the United States, rather than relying on infrastructure or instructions from overseas. This approach focuses on technical separation, verification, and ongoing audits to maintain trust.
If implemented, the deal aims to address core concerns about foreign influence and data access while keeping the platform available to US users. Key implications include:
Key metrics and signals to monitor include the final ownership split, the operational scope of Oracle and other investors, and the specific technical and audit mechanisms that enforce algorithmic separation. Policymakers and businesses should watch for tools and frameworks that support AlgorithmTransparency and digital sovereignty, because the strength of verification will determine whether this arrangement is durable.
The White House’s outline for a restructured TikTok tries to thread a narrow needle: preserve a popular app for US users while addressing perceived national security risks through majority US governance and domestic control of the recommendation AI. Execution, verification, and enforcement will determine whether this becomes a replicable model for balancing technology, security, and open markets, or a temporary solution that raises new oversight challenges. For readers following tech policy, this is a live example of how regulators are pursuing platform regulation with a mix of corporate restructuring and technical controls.