Amazon sent a legal letter to Perplexity over AI agents that enable automated shopping on its platform. The dispute raises platform policy, antitrust, and operational risks for businesses using AI agents. Companies should audit agent design, consent flows, and API use.

Amazon has sent a legal letter to Perplexity, a move reported in early November 2025 that the tech press marks as Amazons first legal threat aimed at an AI company. The dispute centers on Perplexitys AI agents, which Amazon says enable automated shopping that violates its platform rules. Perplexity pushed back with a public blog post calling Amazons approach bullying and arguing its agents act on users behalf rather than scraping data. This confrontation matters for companies that build or rely on AI agents, because it signals rising platform enforcement and legal scrutiny.
AI agents are software programs that execute tasks for a human user, often performing multi step actions such as searching, comparing, and completing purchases. When agents execute transactions automatically they become automated shopping agents that may touch platform terms of service, data access rules, and monetization models. Major platforms like Amazon and Google are rolling out their own assistant and shopping features while tightening rules on how third party tools interact with their services. That dynamic is sometimes called agentic browsing in industry coverage.
This episode is a practical reminder that platform rules are a core product risk for any service that integrates AI agents. Below are concrete steps teams should take now to manage legal and operational exposure.
Regulators are already focused on how big tech bundles services and controls market access. If platforms selectively block independent agents, those actions could trigger closer antitrust scrutiny. In the near term, contract law and the specific wording of platform rules will shape outcomes, so careful legal review is essential for any agent product.
If platforms succeed in limiting independent agents, they may consolidate control of shopping and assistant experiences which could reduce competition and slow downstream innovation. Conversely, high profile pushback and regulatory attention could lead to negotiated access frameworks that balance platform interests with third party innovation.
To improve search visibility for this topic use keywords such as Amazon shopping AI, Perplexity, automated shopping agents, AI agents, agentic browsing, AI shopping assistant, and AI legal disputes ecommerce. Target both informational queries like What is agentic browsing in ecommerce and transactional queries like Best AI tools for Amazon automated shopping in 2026. Emphasize EEAT by adding expert commentary or links to primary sources, and include an FAQ section to capture featured snippets.
The Amazon Perplexity dispute is more than a private disagreement. It is an early test of who will control AI driven shopping experiences. Businesses building or using AI agents should audit their architectures, user consent flows, and API strategies now. Expect rapid developments including negotiated access, litigation, or regulatory involvement. For teams planning production agents, balancing user utility with platform compliance and public transparency is the most reliable way to reduce risk.



